The workplace is not a short-term or occasional human experience. It is one of the most psychologically influential environments in adult life. On average, people spend approximately 2,000 to 2,600+ hours every year connected to work. Over time, those experiences shape far more than performance. They influence stress responses, cognition, emotional regulation, trust, identity, decision-making, relationships and overall human well-being.
This leaves us with an important question. What kind of human experience are people carrying home from work every day?
For generations, mining has demonstrated what is possible when an industry commits to preventing harm. We have engineered safer equipment, strengthened operating systems, advanced critical controls, and transformed the way we identify, assess and manage physical risks.
But as mining enters a new era of automation, artificial intelligence, increasing complexity and workforce transformation, there is another system requiring the same level of discipline. The human system.
Understanding psychosocial risks at work
When our team visits mine sites, conducts psychosocial risk assessments or certifies leaders in psychosocial hazard prevention, we see an increasing commitment to psychological health and safety. Yet a common challenge continues to emerge. The inability to identify where a psychosocial hazard exists within the live system of work.
Many leaders can recognise when someone is stressed, overwhelmed, exhausted or disengaged. However, those are often indicators of exposure. Prevention requires the ability to identify through evidence triangulation, the conditions within the systems of work design and behaviours that have the potential to cause psychological harm.
The International Labour Organization April 2026 report highlighted the growing global impact of psychosocial risks at work, linking 840,000 deaths to chronic exposure to psychosocial hazards in the workplace. The report reinforces excessive demands, long working hours, limited control, injustice, harassment and organisational conditions, can significantly impact worker health.
ISO 45003, the international guidance standard for managing psychosocial risks within an occupational health and safety management system, reinforces that organisations must identify psychosocial hazards, assess risks, implement controls and continually improve.
Australia has moved this further through Work Health and Safety regulations, requiring organisations to manage psychosocial risks with the same level of responsibility applied to other workplace hazards.
Psychological harm prevention is not about managing people’s mental health. It is about managing the workplace conditions that can create risk to psychological health.
Redesigning our systems
During a TeamsynerG Global Consulting webinar on May 27, 2026, Preventing Psychological Harm in the Workplace: Protecting Mental Health Through System-Level Responsibility, I was joined by Mike Parent, President and CEO of Workplace Safety North, and Val Vanderwyk, Executive Director of Indigenous Skills, Employment, Apprenticeship and Development.
Mike shared how his experience as a paramedic, underground miner and safety leader shaped his commitment to prevention. Reflecting on historical approaches, Mike shared, “For the longest time, the focus was on the individual. Oh, let’s help them be more resilient.”
He continued by challenging organisations to ask, “What are the things that we can do as an employer to prevent these from happening, get to the root causes, have the systems in place, the leadership in place, the mechanisms in place?”
In mining, we would never identify a physical hazard and tell someone to become stronger so they can withstand unsafe exposure; we would redesign the system.
The same principle applies to the human system. Every unclear expectation, competing priority, interruption, excessive demand and unresolved conflict requires cognitive capacity.
Pressure itself is not always the problem, mining will always involve complex decisions, demanding environments and challenging work. The risk occurs when exposure becomes prolonged without adequate recovery.
Recovery is not a reward after exhaustion; recovery is a control measure designed into the system.
As Val shared through her experience advancing Indigenous workforce development and women in trades, “We need to recognise that the overall health, the whole person health, is what we have to be addressing in our workplaces.”
This matters deeply as mining builds its future workforce, creating pathways for Indigenous workers, women and future generations requires more than access alone.
As Val powerfully stated, “I am not going to take a host of Indigenous youth and place them in a workplace where they are not going to be psychologically safe.”
Fostering holistic workplace safety
The future of mining will require more than inviting people into the industry. It requires ensuring the systems they enter protect the whole person.
As artificial intelligence, automation, and digital transformation reshape mining, technology may increase efficiency, but human beings remain responsible for judgment, innovation, problem-solving, relationships and critical decisions.
The future of mining will require more than intelligent systems, it will require organisations intelligent enough to protect the humans operating within them, because safety was never only about sending people home physically unharmed. It is about ensuring they do not have to lose part of themselves while doing the work that moves the world forward.
Continue the conversation…
Audrey Hlembizky is CEO TeamsynerG Global Consulting and BIOPTRICS®, and Co-Creator of Whole-Person Safety® System and Co-Author of SAFE UNTIL IT ISN’T. Connect with Audrey on Linkedin.
Read more… on psychological health and safety in the workplace